A. Above the flow element with the impulse tubes sloping upward to the transmitter
B. Above the flow element with the impulse tubes sloping upward then downward to the transmitter
C. Below the flow element with the impulse tubes sloping upward then downward to the transmitter
D. Below the flow element with the impulse tubes sloping downward to the transmitter
Commentary
Accurately transmitting the differential pressure generated by the flow element to the differential pressure transmitter in steam service is somewhat complicated --- as compared to liquid or gas service --- because steam is both hot and condensable. Being hot, it is not desirable to have steam in direct contact with the transmitter. However, cooling the steam will cause the steam to condense and form liquid. Accurate steam measurement can be achieved despite these seemingly contradictory constraints by allowing steam to condense and accumulate where it does not affect the measurement and, in effect, forms a liquid seal.
Answer A is not correct because it allows live steam to directly contact the transmitter. Answer B, Answer C and Answer D provide for a liquid seal to isolate the transmitter from the steam and could be correct if implemented properly.
Additional Complicating Factors
The impulse tubing installation should ensure (1) that the liquid seals generate the same pressure under zero flow conditions at the high and low ports of the differential pressure transmitter or (2) that the transmitter calibration corrects for any difference.
This article originally appeared in Flow Control magazine at www.flowcontrolnetwork.com.